Rights Violations By Hallinan, Ryan, and the Others
   

 

San Francisco D.A.
Terence Hallinan

(then) San Francisco Judge
Kevin Vincent Ryan
   
  1. Violation of status -- When a person enlists or is drafted in the American Armed Forces, that person comes under the Universal Code of Military Justice. This is the very argument that the defenders of the Taliban-loyal fighter John Walker Lindh used to rebut military tribunal authority over him.

  2. When a military person is accused by a local district attorney, or a local judge, of a crime against a local civilian:

    1. That local D.A. or sheriff must first seek the written permission of the Governor or Attorney General of that state. It has taken over four years to get a response specifically on the lack of State jurisdiction over a Federal military person. On March 15, 2002 California Governor Grey Davis issued a two-page response regarding the lack of State documentation and permission from the Secretary of the Navy (John Dalton and then Richard Danzig) for their specific permission for State prosecution of Steven Nary, USN.

    2. Terence Hallinan and his at-will employee, Peter Cling, didn't do that. Instead they falsified a document claiming that they had executive authority of the Governor to seek the removal of Steven R. Nary from locked confinement aboard a U.S. military vessel under the exclusive authority of the Federal Government

    3. Additionally, Hallinan didn't seek nor did he receive then-Governor Pete Wilson's executive authority to seek permission -- which doesn't have to be granted -- of the U.S. Secretary of the Navy. (See Exhibit) According to Hallinan's own press release,

        "We were appalled by the level of violence involved here and decided from the outset that we would aggressively prosecute this case,’’ said Hallinan..."I am especially proud of the way Assistant District Attorney John Farrell handled this trial."

        (http://www.ci.sf.ca.us/da/press/1999/p102899.htm)

    4. Because of the ambivalence of the Clinton Administration on the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Homosexual/Lesbian Military issue, neither the Secretary of the Navy nor President Clinton or Attorney General Reno did anything to protect the Federal Government's prior and continuing authority over all Federal military personnnel.

    5. It followed that Hallinan, his deputies John M. Farrell and Peter Cling along with local judges -- including the former Federal Judge wannabe Kevin Vincent Ryan:

      • Prepared false evidence

      • Used false evidence to inflame an illegally impaneled jury

      • Put the U.S. Navy on trial as "homophobic"

      • Allowed political activists, CUAV/Act Up pro-pervert and pro-illegal alien, to openly and corruptly lobby Ryan's jury that he illegally impaneled because he was automatically disqualified because of his own extensive homosexual political connections and pro-homosexual biases against the U.S. Navy.

 

  
   
 
    Exhibits:   
     
     
    (back)  
     
   

(Note: Peter Cling had no authority to bind the State of California to any agreement.)

(back) 		 
     
     
     
   

[Stickers worn by the illegal lobbyists in the courtroom who were allowed to corrupt the jury.]

According the Californa Penal Code, SS 96:

"Every juror, or person drawn or summoned as a juror, or chosen arbitrator or umpire, or appointed referee, who either:

  1. Makes any promise or agreement to give a verdict or decision for or against any party; or,
  2. Willfully and corruptly permits any communication to be made to him, or receives any book, paper, instrument, or information relating to any cause or matter pending before him, except according to the regular course of proceedings,

is punishable by fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment in the state prison." [Juror List]

(back)

 

  
       
     
       
       
   
= || Amicus Veritas home page|| =