"THIS CASE IS GOING NOWHERE!"
Caustic comment from the homosexual law clerks in the 9th circuit's federal courts
   
 

Even though by the US Department of Justice's own standards and regulations for its authority and jurisdiction in this violation by San Francisco's homosexual and homophile district attorney, his at will employees and the local county and state judges, when sailor Nary's legal researcher filed removal of Hallinan's illegal prosecution and his legal briefs and in the ninth federal circuit's district and federal appellate courts, their homosexual clerks and staff attorney(s) responses were: "This case is going no where……..I'm not going to do your work….."

The arrogant attitude of these sexual preference advocates is one of the underlying reasons that the critics of the 9th federal circuit view that court as "paralyzed by its sexual and political inertia. Therefore Congress needs to split up this troubled circuit to restore the prestige, competence and authority of the federal courts.

Cathy Patterson (above) is the clerk of the controversial 9th federal circuit. These homophiles and homosexuals with their own agenda were identified in their obstruction of justice in Nary US Navy apprentice Sailor vs. Terrance Hallinan, District Attorney of San Francisco and his political ally, Michael Hennessey, Sheriff of San Francisco County.

In the 2003 City and County election, San Francisco's voters booted out Terrance Hallinan. A retired CIA agent, who was familiar with Hallinan and his violations in this case, described Hallinan as " Your (San Francisco City & County's corrupt district attorney."

Michael Hennessey also shares that political billing.

This is the relevant excerpt of the US Depart of Justice's Own Manual of Proper Procedures for the type of cases in their national jurisdiction and responsibility.

US JUSTICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURAL MANUAL
SECTION 8-.130 CASE OF NATIONAL INTEREST 1.

  1. This is of "national interest" because it presents important public policy considerations:

    Removal or kidnapping of a federal military person from armed locked confinement and detention aboard a US Navy ship docked at a federal military enclave.

    Three and half years of abuse inflicted upon the sailor, without any protest and action taken by the US Attorney Northern California, Justice Department, US Navy, Secretaries of Defense and Navy

    Despite repeated certified notification to the Congressional chairpersons of the Judiciary and Armed Services Committee of these violations, no politician intervened under their federal authority to do so

    This case sets a dangerous precedent because of the certified documentation of the violations, this case also sends a signal to would be predators, terrorists and thugs that they can kidnap, abduct, abuse and try in a kangaroo court, Americans, whether military, diplomatic or civilian status.

    These thugs have nothing to fear and nobody to account to.

  2. Novel issue of Law (Defiance of federal civil and federal military law), Forgery of Federal Military Forms) Homosexual predator cover up. These laws, basic court cases and regulations are:

    US Code title 10 chapter 813 (conditions of confinement) & 814 The military Service Secretary must grant permission first, before a federal military person be turned over or delivered to state authorities

    The Executive authority of a state, its Governor or State Attorney General must first make a formal written request to the military service secretary- in this case, the Secretary of the Nary--for him or her to turn over to state authorities, the military serviceman or women to be tried by state court, where the offense was committed.
  3. The military service secretary does not have to grant his permission for a state court to deliver or turn over the accused military service man or woman. Nor can the governor of a state or local district attorney compel a federal official to turn over or deliver an accused serviceman or woman for a local trial. The authority of a military service secretary also protects an accused military serviceman or woman, when it is suspected that the accused federal military person would not get a fair trial in a local or sate court. This protection is part of the federal code of Regulations title 32 CFR 700-720.6
  4. This fact of an unfair and illegal trial was documented in the State of California vs Nary US Navy 1999 trial held in San Francisco,in which navy sailor Steven Nary's constitutional rights violations by San Francisco's district attorney and local judge, Kevin V. Ryan, Robert Dondero, Ann Bouilane and Sheriff Michael Hennesey was irrefutably documented.
  5. Bill Lockyer, California's State Attorney General never defended in federal court, nor filed in legal briefs in federal court defending Terrance Hallinan,Kevin V. Ryan and Michael Hennesey's three and a half years of abuse of Steven Nary's constitutional rights and due process.

    Code of Federal Regulations subsections 720.6 3.

  6. This case has a Peculiar Set of Circumstances (homosexual stalking, luring and assault by a politically connected illegal alien with at least two known prior sexual assaults involving an undercover vice cop, and young military recruits.

  7. This case Sets an important precedent (by allowing local police to enter a federal military enclave without permission of the Base Commander

    An illegal midnight interrogation was conducted on a US Navy ship then ported in a federal military enclave or base.

    No lawyer was present at this illegal interrogation conducted at midnight on March 28, 1996

  8. The Removal by San Francisco police of a federal military prisoner from a federal military ship without any permission or request by the State Governor( Wilson)and the Military Service Secretary (SECNAV John Dalton) in this case.

  9. This Case has international and foreign policy implications: This illegal San Francisco court case was well publicized by the sexual preference press as well as the anti-Don't Ask, Don't Tell Commercial press. Because of the number of prominent national politicians, judges, political and judicial facilitators involved, this case signals to would be foreign and domestic sexual predators, terrorists and thugs, that the US Government will not protect its military personnel, who are victims of sexual predators and thugs.

  10. This case substantially affects the uniform application of federal civil and federal military law

    For nearly nine years, San Francisco's homosexual and anti-US Military constituency in the local and state courts have not been called to account or prosecuted by the federal government for their illegal role in the violations of US navy sailor Nary due process and constitutionally protected civil and human rights.

    These San Francisco judicial usurpers have violated their oaths to fully comply "with all decisions rendered by the US Supreme Court and all federal civil and military courts.

    These judicial usurpers have sent a signal to would be foreign predators, terrorists and thugs that it "is open season on American civilians, diplomats, businessmen and military personnel."
   

 

These judicial usurpers have signaled that any federal military person in local jails and prisons can be abused because, without federal intervention, Steven Nary US Navy was abused for over three and a half years.

Neither the federal government nor the US Navy, which had a constitutional obligation,did anything to protect this US Navy sailor's rights from the many violations perpetrated upon him by San Francisco's local judges and San Francisco's district attorney, both parties put the US Navy and the US Marines Corps. on local trial as "homophobic.".

There are other cases in which military veterans were also railroaded into California's state prison by San Francisco's district attorney Haling and his local judges.

San Francisco's heterophobic media, which is editorially opposed to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" also participated in the railroading and judicial sodomy of sailor Nary.
     
 
= || Amicus Veritas home page|| =