UNITED STATES
v.
GRIMLEY.
137 U.S. 147
November 17, 1890
This is standing US Supreme Court case since the 1890, in which the
US Supreme Court ruled that when a civilian enlists in the federal military,
there is not only a change of status but that person comes under federal
military jurisdiction.
Walker claims to be an experienced lawyer and a so-called civil rights activist. Yet he was ignorant of the landmark civil war US Supreme court case Tarbel. In that case, the issue was the interference of a local Wisconsin state court in federal military affairs that involved an 18 year old enlistee.
More recently,Walker should also have known about Perpich vs The US Department of Defense. This US Supreme court case, quotes Tarbel, involved the Governor of Minnesota attempting to block the federalization of the Minnesota Air National Guard for service in central South America. Perpich lost.
Further, throughout
the year and half that Walker and Alan Dressler, Walker's associate attorney
and sidekick, had this case, the two incompetent lawyers were repeatedly
informed about the multiplicity of detainee/prisoner violations of sailor
Nary's human, due process, and conditions of confinement rights that were
perpetrated by Terence Hallinan and his judges.
