This new documented series of webpages exposes San Francisco's
and California's notorious infamous sites that are unknown, unpublicized or
censored by the media's morons and tour guides. Some little known famous sites are also documented
These sites are significant because of their connection to
***Public Corruption
***An agenda which has consequences and growing costs to the American Taxpayer
***is connected to or involves the undermining of our national securiny
***is connected to domestic and international terroism and terroists
***HUD --Small Business Adminisration--FEMA-Real estate Racketeering
***AIDS Funding--Housing--Programs non accountability
***Local-National -International Impact
***Polling Fraud(Field etc.)
***locations of Pedophilia-Pederestay--Pornography--Prostitution--Spycamming/hidden camera in
exercise gym-public school--colleges and Military locker rooms--saunas
etc.--Local-National--International Sex Trade
***Locations of local, national and international illegal drug trade
***Vote Fraud

"222 Sutter Street in San Francisco's Downtown--This is the Infamous site where the Field Poll operates on the 7th floor."
According to the California State Secretary of State Voter Registration
statics, there are approximately 16 million voters in California.
Critics of the Homosexual-Lesbian political agenda ask these questions:
***of the 1020 respondants to the Field Gay Marrage poll, how many were registered voters?
***How many respondants were asked "if they were going to vote in November 2008?
***Were the respondants asked about their "sexual or lack of sexual preference?"
***How was the polling cluster created?
***What was the age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location background of the repondants to the Field Poll?
***Who or what organization chose the respondants or people to be polled?
***Who if anyone verified the respondant's answers?
***Who or what organization(s) paid for this poll?
***How did Field obtain cell phone numbers?
The botton line is this: " Are the repondants and
Field's polling extrapolated statics valid in the November 2008
election? Or did the respondants tell Field one thing but when
these respondants go into the voter's booth, or do an absentee ballow, vote differently from the
answers that they gave to the Field Poll?
Neither VERITAS USA! or AMICUSVERITAS.ORG have ever been
able to get the Field Poll/ Mark DiCamillo to respond to questions
about their polling methodology!